Both matches were played to a similar format with City almost completely changing their team at half time. Given the very large squad we currently have, this would appear to be a sensible policy as it gives Ole the chance to see most of the players available to him in action before we are halfway through July, but, while the theory was sound, the practice proved to be more problematic.
For example, an early injury to Craig Noone (who may require an operation which will cause him to miss the start of the season) in the Carmarthen match saw him replaced by new signing Guido Bergstaller. With Ole reluctant to give any of his outfield players more than sixty minutes playing time, the Austrian then had to be replaced for the last twenty minutes or so, but, with all of the other substitutes used, it was back up keeper Ben Wilson who had to come on and play in our midfield! On Saturday, it was Kevin Theophile-Catharine who picked up a second half knock and there was only Joe Lewis left on the bench to replace him, but, this time, Ole decided to play on with just the ten men – I suppose it gave the team some practice for a situation they are likely to encounter during the upcoming season as the odds have to be against us having eleven players on the pitch at the end of every match we play.
City’s goals at Carmarthen were scored by Nicky Maynard and Joe Mason for the first half team, while it was Frederico Macheda who found the net after the break. At Bath, Jan Inge Berget put us ahead in the second half, but former City Academy scholar Zac Evans leveled for the home side. A draw against a team four levels below us in the English football pyramid and a so, so win over a Welsh Premier League outfit are hardly going to get the other twenty three Championship teams quaking in fear, but that’s not the point of these games – I daresay a couple of 8-0 wins would have got people sitting up and taking notice, but it’s much too early yet to start drawing any conclusions about how we are going to do based on what we see in warm up games.
Apart from a story claiming a proposed season long loan deal for Manchester United centreback Michael Keane only needs to be rubber stamped by new manager Louis Van Gaal for it to go ahead, there has been no talk of new players in the past week, but there have been a couple of departures and there’s a growing feeling that there will be a few more shortly.
It was revealed last week that Don Cowie had turned down the offer of a contract extension at Cardiff and on Thursday Wigan Athletic announced that the underrated midfield man had become the second Cardiff player to sign for Uwe Rosler’s side this summer – I wish all the best at his new club to a player who always gave his all in a City shirt. Young centre back Ben Nugent’s departure is a temporary one with his loan to Yeovil due to end on 4 January, while Ole confirmed yesterday that Kevin McNaughton will be joining Bolton on a season long loan deal shortly (this is an odd one to me, why give a new one year contract to someone who you are prepared to loan out until May?).
Apart from savings to the wage bill and possible loan fees, none of these moves will make the club much money, but it looks like some of the predicted departures of established first team players are going to be happening sooner rather than later and, it may be that these will net the club not far short of £20 million in transfer fees alone. Inter Milan have been in discussions with City regarding Gary Medel – if the reports coming out of Italy are to be believed, the two clubs are some way apart with Inter favouring a season long loan to be followed by a permanent deal if things go well, while City look for an immediate sale for a fee of around £10 million (which would be not far short of double what Inter are prepared to pay if the rumours are to be believed).
With Olympique Marseille also joining in the chase for the Chilean international apparently, City’s chance of getting the sort of fee they are holding out for appear to be better than they looked a few days ago – certainly, if we could get an eight figure sum for Medel, then the new Committee structure which oversees transfer in and out of the club could legitimately claim kudos for delivering such a deal.
In the case of Steven Caulker, the fee has been set at more or less what we paid for him and it looks as if a few clubs have been prepared to match the release clause figure in his contract. So, it’s widely reported that we should be getting £8 million for the centreback, but the question is who from? For a fortnight or so, it looked pretty certain that QPR would be securing Caulker’s services, but, after stories that the player was holding out for a move to Liverpool (negotiations with the Anfield club were reported to have stalled originally over the player’s wage demands), it’s now claimed that he is signing for Crystal Palace.
Excessive wage demands are almost certainly the reason why Leicester City pulled out of their move for Fraizer Campbell and, for a short while, the possibility of the striker starting the season at Cardiff was being entertained, but Palace are, seemingly, also in for Campbell and so it looks like Tony Pulis will be looking to extend his record of never being relegated as a manager with two members of the team that finished bottom of last season’s Premier League in his squad.
The moment that won the World Cup. Mario Goetze’s fine finish puts Germany into the lead – perhaps their win over Argentina was a little lucky, but, overall, the first European side to win a World Cup held in South America were worthy winners of a fine competition.
Just to finish with a few paragraphs about the World Cup. My belief that Brazil would win the tournament because their superb home record would be too much of an obstacle for anyone to overcome, was spectacularly blown out of the water in just about the most incredible game I’ve ever seen. If ever there was a side that would not be intimidated by playing the most successful team in World Cup history in their own backyard, it would be Germany and, with Brazil’s two most influential players absent, I did concede there was a possibility that I might be proved wrong, but, if Germany were to win then I could only see it being by a single goal or on penalties. Instead, we witnessed a massacre – the writing was on the wall for Brazil in the time after they went 1-0 down as their opponents kept on opening them up so easily and once the second one went in, the game resembled a practice match with four of the goals being tap ins as a rudderless home team simply imploded.
Brazil’s feeble performance in losing 3-0 to the Netherlands in the Third Place match on Saturday night showed that the wounds from four days earlier were still open and the devastating and humiliating nature of the loss to Germany means that I wouldn’t be surprised if the Brazil team is still bleeding for decades to come. In fact, in a nation which places so much store in football, I feel that the psyche of the country as a whole could be seriously affected for years to come – in sporting terms the only thing I can think of which might influence a country’s morale as much as Brazil 1 Germany 7 is if the All Blacks had been beaten something like 70-10 by France in the 2011 World Cup Final and, even then, I’m not sure the hurt would go so deep.
So were Brazil very bad or were Germany just brilliant? Well, the evidence of last night’s Final suggests to me that it was more the first option than the second one. Although Germany finished the ninety minutes the stronger and looked the better team in extra time, I thought their 1-0 win over Argentina flattered them, because it was the South Americans who created, and wasted, the better chances. Leaving the Brazil game to one side, Germany’s 4-0 dismantling of Portugal in their opening match marked them down as potential winners and I believe that, overall, they were the strongest team in the competition, but, for me, Argentina raised their game in the Final in every department, except for finishing.
With the winning goal coming deep into extra time just as everyone was thinking that a penalty shoot out was inevitable, I suppose it could be claimed that the Final was similar to the one four years earlier in South Africa, but that apart, there was little common ground between the two matches. In 2010, one of the sides involved seemed more interested in kicking lumps out of their opponents than trying to win the game, whereas last night you got the impression that both sides wanted to win the game by going for goals throughout. True, Argentina were content to play a counter attacking game, but the speed and purpose they showed when they did break forward offered all the proof you needed that their outlook was far from a defensive one.
By offering a much more watchable final than many in recent memory, Brazil 2014 confirmed that it was the best of the modern day World Cup tournaments. However, for me, although Germany came close at times, it didn’t have the outstanding team or classic Final to put it above 1970 and Lionel Messi’s failure to really impose himself on the competition meant that it also didn’t have the brilliant individual that lit up the 1986 tournament (the Final that year was a real thriller as well). So, 1970 and 1986 remain the two best Worlds Cups I’ve seen, but 2014 is there in third place because, by and large, it was full of positive football, had one or two truly amazing matches and had a verve and a colour that was not totally down to it’s brilliant setting.
http://mauveandyellowarmy.net/